A graph presenting high school equivalency test data from the Center for an Urban Future
In my opinion, New York State would have been better off not switching to the TASC, even though it costs less. Consider this: it's estimated that workers in New York State who have no high school diploma or high school equivalency degree are more than twice as likely to be unemployed in comparison to the average worker. Also, note that approximately one out of every 3 individuals in this category are living below the poverty line.
Sure, I realize that this is a very complex issue, and that it isn't nearly as black and white as the data suggests, but I still think it would have been much more beneficial economically to have not switched to the TASC.
I'm going to go out on a limb here with my own idea and suggest that the brand recognition of the TASC test itself is part of the problem. The original GED test was released way back in the 1940s, and I'd be willing to bet that if you were to go ask random people if they've heard of it, at least 9/10 would say they have. On the other hand, my guess (and this is only a guess) is that the number who have heard of the TASC would be much lower!
This is saying nothing about the quality of the TASC itself! My point is just that perhaps there's a lot of confusion out there as to what the TASC actually is and the fact that it is now the standard high school equivalency test! We have to remember that many people who pursue high school equivalency tests have been out of formal education for at least 10 - 20 years, and just might not be aware of the changes!
The good news is that the report indicates that more and more officials and instructors are becoming aware of the problem, which gives us great reason to believe the pass rates will begin to rebound shortly, and will continue to improve more and more over the next few years!
|